<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Very Own Aperture 3 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/</link>
	<description>Digital Photography, Apple Aperture, and other stuff!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:06:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aperture 3 Now Just $79!!!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Aperture 3 Now Just $79!!!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertureland.com/?p=289#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>[...] BTW, if you&#8217;re deciding between Aperture 3 and Lightroom 3, read this article. And if you&#8217;re trying to decide whether you want Aperture at all, read my Aperture 3 review. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BTW, if you&#8217;re deciding between Aperture 3 and Lightroom 3, read this article. And if you&#8217;re trying to decide whether you want Aperture at all, read my Aperture 3 review. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s austone</title>
		<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/comment-page-1/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>s austone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertureland.com/?p=289#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>But A3 doesn&#039;t have layering function; that is a big difference from Elements 9
Do you think Apple is planning on adding that feature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But A3 doesn&#8217;t have layering function; that is a big difference from Elements 9<br />
Do you think Apple is planning on adding that feature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adobe Photoshop Elements 9</title>
		<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Adobe Photoshop Elements 9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertureland.com/?p=289#comment-911</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m sticking with Aperture 3 because of its superior organizational features, but there&#8217;s no doubt that Photoshop Elements [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m sticking with Aperture 3 because of its superior organizational features, but there&#8217;s no doubt that Photoshop Elements [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/comment-page-1/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertureland.com/?p=289#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Tony, I&#039;ve used AP3 for 4 weeks now, rather heavily. No, it does not have layers like Photoshop. I will use CS4 or CS5 for special images that need layers. AP3 is not meant to replace Photoshop, but it is like Camera RAW &#039;deluxe&#039; with &#039;Bridge Deluxe&#039; too. That&#039;s a crude description, but I see AP3 replacing my use of Bridge, but not Photoshop. 
Even though you don&#039;t have layers in AP3, you can do something that mimics it to an extent. You can create multiple adjustments for a specific image. E.g, if you apply a curve adjustment to the sky, and want to apply a different curve to the water, then just create another adjustment curve, and &#039;paint&#039; the curve to the water. Not as elegant as layers, but accomplishes the same thing. Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, I&#8217;ve used AP3 for 4 weeks now, rather heavily. No, it does not have layers like Photoshop. I will use CS4 or CS5 for special images that need layers. AP3 is not meant to replace Photoshop, but it is like Camera RAW &#8216;deluxe&#8217; with &#8216;Bridge Deluxe&#8217; too. That&#8217;s a crude description, but I see AP3 replacing my use of Bridge, but not Photoshop.<br />
Even though you don&#8217;t have layers in AP3, you can do something that mimics it to an extent. You can create multiple adjustments for a specific image. E.g, if you apply a curve adjustment to the sky, and want to apply a different curve to the water, then just create another adjustment curve, and &#8216;paint&#8217; the curve to the water. Not as elegant as layers, but accomplishes the same thing. Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertureland.com/?p=289#comment-624</guid>
		<description>On photoshop you can do layering.  Is there anything on Aperture 3 that does the same thing as layers on photoshop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On photoshop you can do layering.  Is there anything on Aperture 3 that does the same thing as layers on photoshop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertureland.com/?p=289#comment-586</guid>
		<description>great review, thank you! 
I&#039;m still tossing up between the 2 packages, despite being almost convinced on Aperture 3, there is 1 very important function missing from it, a function I use a lot - it cannot stitch photos together?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great review, thank you!<br />
I&#8217;m still tossing up between the 2 packages, despite being almost convinced on Aperture 3, there is 1 very important function missing from it, a function I use a lot &#8211; it cannot stitch photos together?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertureland.com/?p=289#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Mike-

Nice review - and helpful, too.

I just upgraded to Aperture 3 and support for Foveon X3F files is still missing.  This really should be a match made in heaven, with the superior image quality of Foveon and processing of Aperture.  The two small players could really push this big, I think, and there have been a lot of blogs and other input to Apple pushing it.

Any word if anyone at Apple is listening?

Thanks again - 
Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike-</p>
<p>Nice review &#8211; and helpful, too.</p>
<p>I just upgraded to Aperture 3 and support for Foveon X3F files is still missing.  This really should be a match made in heaven, with the superior image quality of Foveon and processing of Aperture.  The two small players could really push this big, I think, and there have been a lot of blogs and other input to Apple pushing it.</p>
<p>Any word if anyone at Apple is listening?</p>
<p>Thanks again &#8211;<br />
Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Example of an Aperture 3 Slideshow</title>
		<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>An Example of an Aperture 3 Slideshow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 23:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertureland.com/?p=289#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] Updates &#8211; I put together a quick slideshow using the Ken Burns theme, and I commented on Aperture 3&#8217;s slideshow capabilities in my Aperture 3 review. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Updates &#8211; I put together a quick slideshow using the Ken Burns theme, and I commented on Aperture 3&#8217;s slideshow capabilities in my Aperture 3 review. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FIGHT! Aperture 3 vs. Photoshop Elements</title>
		<link>http://www.apertureland.com/2010/04/18/aperture-3-review-photoshop-cs5-raw-best-price/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>FIGHT! Aperture 3 vs. Photoshop Elements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertureland.com/?p=289#comment-78</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here for the best deals on Aperture 3. or read my complete Aperture 3 review. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here for the best deals on Aperture 3. or read my complete Aperture 3 review. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

