Aperture 3 and Secrecy

by admin on February 18, 2010

Kuanghui Lim makes a good case against Apple’s secrecy in his comparison of Aperture 3’s handling vs. Adobe’s more open stance with Lightroom:

In contrast to Apple, Adobe has taken a different approach with Lightroom. In October last year it launched the new version as a public beta, available for anyone to download and try for free (the software expires automatically at the launch of the actual product). The public beta gives Adobe precious information from real-world customers on a massive scale. In addition, customers are able to experiment with features likely to be included in the final version, rather than being kept in the dark with no way to anticipate and plan their own businesses around Adobe’s roadmap.

Looking more broadly, my sense is that Apple’s secrecy is costing it not just with Aperture but also with other recent product launches. For example, iPad developers are in a scramble to develop software for the new device which ships in about 2 months. Apparently even Apple’s close allies were introduced to the iPad just weeks before it was publicly announced. Even Apple’s new Snow Leopard operating system had its share of bad surprises after it was launched, causing some cases of data corruption.

I’m an Apple fanboy, but even I have to admit that Mr. Lim makes some very good points.

HT

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: